|
Lincoln's Darkest Year: The War in 1862 | 
 enlarge | Author: William Marvel
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin
Category: Book
List Price: $30.00
Buy New: $14.76
You Save: $15.24 (51%)
New (31) Used (11) from $14.58
Rating:  2 reviews
Sales Rank: 135882
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Pages: 480
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4
Dimensions (in): 9.4 x 1.6 x 0.1
ISBN: 0618858695
Dewey Decimal Number: 973.7
EAN: 9780618858699
ASIN: 0618858695
Publication Date: July 16, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: NEW: NEVER READ...!!!!.(may have faint shelf wear from bookstore)..ALL ORDERS SHIP SAME OR NEXT BUSINESS DAY, FREE POSTAL DELIVERY CONFIRMATION FOR U.S. ORDERS, TOP CUSTOMER SERVICE !!!!
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
A revealing look at Lincoln's actions in 1862?and a nation in the midst of war
Lincoln's Darkest Year offers a gripping narrative of 1862, a pivotal year in our country's Civil War. Marvel continues the story he began in Mr. Lincoln Goes to War, which focused on Lincoln's first year in office, again relying on recently unearthed primary sources and little-known accounts to paint a picture of this critical year in newfound detail. Lincoln's Darkest Year highlights not just the actions but also the deeper motivations of the major figures, including General Ulysses S. Grant, Jefferson Davis, George McClellan, Stonewall Jackson, and, most notably, Lincoln himself. As the action darts from the White House to the battlefields and back, Marvel sheds new light on the hardships endured by everyday citizens and the substantial and sustained public opposition to the war.
The second in a planned four-part series on the Civil War, and the first major reexamination in over fifty years, Lincoln's Darkest Year stands apart from traditional assumptions and narratives about the early years of the Civil War. Marvel combines fluid prose and scholarship with the skills of an investigative historical detective to unearth the true story of our nation's greatest crisis.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Marvel's Civil War Perspective October 12, 2008
David Kelly (Petersburg, VA United States)
If nothing else William Marvel is always entertaining. As with most of his works the facts have a way of getting bent to the thrust of Marvel's point whether they are accurate or not. This is a tale of political mayhem coping with crisis. A young and imperfect American System trying to win a critical war in spite of itself. Marvel seems to glory in forcing the reader to see the soft underbelly of patriotism and national pride to see the bloody mess that lubricates the road to victory.
The national army is depicted as led by amateurs and manned by the forsaken of society. As important as winning may be partisan politics, spoilage and ideological differences hamstring the war effort.
Now, there is in fact a lot of truth to this. I don't mind that William Marvel lays all of this out for us to ponder. But he's doing so in a journalistic fashion that loses the reader in the trees without any hope of ever seeing the forest.
Case in point. Marvel spends an unusual amount of time talking about manpower mobilization for the war effort, and how poorly it was coordinated. The average reader doesn't know the long painful history of the issue, and the fractional policy that inhibited control over the process. By law, the federal government could ask for units, but there was no replacement system to man those units. By August of 1861 this problem was broached by the War Department. The situation was a driving force for national conscription policy which was badly begun in 1863. I think Marvel miscasts the problem for the sake of drama.
While there is a great deal of political strife over the conduct of the war and its political goals, the body of legislation produced by the Congress constantly moves towards correcting laws that inhibit prosecution of the war. Moderates and radicals counterplot to try and influence the shaping of things. Military failure fuels radical solutions. But all agree on the cause of preserving a sovereign Union as a fundamental objective.
I love William Marvel. I've bought all his books. But over the years I've come to see him as a maverick who'll offer a wild ride that can't be relied on as a primary interpreter. Great reading. Handle with care.
 Challenging and thought provoking! August 1, 2008
James Durney (Tampa Bay area)
6 out of 10 found this review helpful
1862 is one of the most interesting years in American history and a critical year in the Civil War. In that year, the war changes from a great adventure that will end soon to a bloody war with no end in sight. In that year, the war's objective changes from restoring the union of states to a fundamental change in society. Americans, North and South, undergo a series of radical changes in response to current events and to long-term differences. William Marvel brings this complex and difficult year to life. He gives us a not always comfortable look at how Lincoln changes the war's direction and how the North reacted to that change. The South is not a major player in this book. Their commitment to victory and willingness to sacrifice came earlier than the North. They are cast in a reactionary role throughout the book. This does not detract from the story. The principle players are Lincoln, the Abolitionists, the Democrats and the people.
This is not a comfortable read. Lincoln is not at his best. He is learning the duties of President and Commander in Chief. While his determination to reunite the nation is unshakable, how reunification will take place is questionable. Surrounded by pressure groups, Lincoln is pulled in many directions. The Radical Republicans, in control of Congress, have determined to purge the army of "enemies". Men having the proper values and view of America's future will replace those purged. The Democrats are split between supporting the war and doubting that winning is possible or desirable. The Radicals and Abolitionists wish to end slavery. The War Democrats wish to reunite the nation and the Peace Democrats want the war to end. The major portion of the book is devoted to the politics of this battle. The critical off-year elections and the administrations reactions to public comment is the main story. Debate and dissent become crimes. The Radicals and the Administration assume more power and compel the states to support the war. This is not a standard Civil War history of 1862. It is a very complex political story of a government doing what is required to win.
Military history is not ignored. While not the major story, battlefield event drive much of the politics. Shiloh is the first major bloodletting of the war. We forget this with all the big battles yet to be fought. For the people, Shiloh is a shock. No battle had ever come close to the number of casualties incurred. The Seven Days, Second Bull Run and Antietam in the coming months empty the armies. Requirement and conscription create another political crisis. Military and political intermix forming one seamless story.
I said this is not a comfortable read, 1862 is a very hard year. A multitude of bad decisions, missed opportunities and miscalculations, result in causalities and may have prolonged the war. Lincoln makes a number of very bad military decisions during this time. Stanton and Halleck bear some of the responsibility but they are Lincoln's decisions. This book shows Lincoln in a different light. He is not the Great Emancipator or Savior of the Union. He is a fearful politician reacting to pressure in an unfamiliar environment. This will not be popular but it is historical and realistic.
The Radical Republicans are determined to punish the enemy and reward supporters. They purge the government and army filling spots with supporters. Unqualified political generals, incompetents and fools that they approve of are promoted. McClellan is an early entry on their hit list and suffers for it. Freemont, Pope and Banks all have warm support in Washington. This is political warfare with no quarter.
The battle to change the war from Union to Abolition of slavery is a major story. Public reaction in and out of the army is not favorable. This story will upset a number of readers too.
I disagree with the author's attack on Grant for not entrenching at Shiloh. It is one of the harshest and one-sided attacks I have seen. I feel it is very unfair ignoring the standards in entrenchments in early 1862 and the Drill vs. Dig requirements of his army. Other than that, I feel his views on Lincoln, Stanton, Halleck and McClellan are fair and correct for 1862.
William Marvel has won multiple prizes for his books. I think he is one of the best Civil War authors we have. His scholarship is unquestioned and he has excellent writing skills. Lincoln's Darkest Year is not a comfortable read. It is challenging and thought provoking read. This is close to a must read and a five star book.
|
|
|
Navy Advancement Study Guide
Top Selling Navy Enlisted Books | |
