|
Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Blue) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Oregon Scientific
Category: Photography
List Price: $119.95
Buy New: $59.95
You Save: $60.00 (50%)
New (5) from $59.95
Rating:  16 reviews
Sales Rank: 36969
Color: Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP Digital Camera (Blue)
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Batteries Included: No
Floppy Disk Drive: None
Optical Zoom: 1
Display Size: 1.5
Minimum Focal Length: 8.2
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9 x 8.3 x 2.8
MPN: DS6310-B
Model: DS6310-B
UPC: 734811316080
EAN: 0734811316080
ASIN: B000BK7R78
Release Date: November 15, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | 3.0 megapixel CMOS sensor produces images of up to 2032 x 1524 pixels | | • | Features built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5-inch color TFT display | | • | Includes USB transfer cradle, software, USB cable, rechargeable Li-Polymer battery, hand strap and carrying case | | • | Supports SD cards for extra memory | | • | Dimensions: 3.5 x 2.2 x 0.5 inches (WxHxD) |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Smaller than a deck of cards, this slim design takes superb, high-resolution pictures.- 3.0-megapixel CMOS sensor
- Up to 2032 x 1524 pixel resolution
- 16MB internal memory
- Supports SD memory cards
- 4X digital zoom
- 1.5" color TFT display
- Built-in flash with Autobrite technology
- USB transfer cradle& cable
- Includes photo editing software
- Hand strap and carrying case
- Internal rechargeable batteries
- 3-month manufacturer's warranty
Ideal for travel, this slim design is easy to carry in a pocket or purse and takes the quality pictures you want. It's the perfect way to remember your adventures!
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 5 more reviews...
 Don't buy CMOS cameras May 6, 2008
Sylvia (NY/NJ)
Most good digital cameras use CCD lens technology. CMOS is old, normally used for security cameras. Even though I don't own this camera (and I generally hate reading reviews by people who don't own the product), I have owned a Polaroid camera of similar specs & price - with a CMOS lens. It mysteriously died in less than a year (company would service, but it would cost almost as much as purchase price for part) and picture quality was horrible. I regret not having done my research, b/c I took pics of my first baby with it and now with my second baby on a Canon, I can totally see the difference in quality.
General tip I've learned: if the company doesn't have a history of making cameras (35mm cameras), then don't trust it! (Kodak and Fuji are probably OK, but not the best.) I remember Oregon Scientific from the calculators I used while I was flunking calculus...!
 Small lightweight camera June 1, 2007
Edward H. Sessions (Kissimmee, Florida USA)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This camera takes good pictures for being so compact. A little difficult at the begining to take a picture, but after I followed the instructions it was a snap.
NOT WORTH IT January 16, 2007
J. moore (GRANTS PASS, OR United States)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
PICTURE QUALITY FOR A 3 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA IS VERY DISAPPOINTING! THE ONLY GOOD THING IS ITS SMALL SIZE. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA FOR ANYTHING BUT A CHILDS TOY AND AT THE SELLING PRICE IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THAT.
Don't bother November 24, 2006
Gemstar
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Extremely low quality pics. Short battery life. Not worth spending any money on.
I got this camera for free thank goodness. Now I am just trying to find a way to get rid of it.
Pretty Good September 1, 2006
A. marino (VA, USA)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I got this camera back in 2003 and I loved it..i would take it everywhere...but then no too long ago it just stopd working and i really dont know what was wrong w it..but hey for a first time slim camera is not bad @ all..
|
|
|
Navy Advancement Study Guide
Top Selling Navy Enlisted Books | |
